0.10/0.14	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.16	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.15/0.38	% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
0.15/0.38	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.38	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.38	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.38	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.38	% CPULimit   : 960
0.15/0.38	% WCLimit    : 120
0.15/0.38	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:31:04 EDT 2022
0.15/0.38	% CPUTime    : 
0.23/0.53	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.23/0.53	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.23/0.54	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.23/0.55	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.23/0.55	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 12743 completed with status 0
0.23/0.55	# Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
0.23/0.55	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.23/0.55	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# No SInE strategy applied
0.23/0.55	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.23/0.55	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# post_as_ho12 with pid 12746 completed with status 0
0.23/0.55	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.23/0.55	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.23/0.55	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# No SInE strategy applied
0.23/0.55	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.23/0.55	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.23/0.55	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores
0.23/0.55	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.23/0.55	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.23/0.55	
0.23/0.55	# Proof found!
0.23/0.55	# SZS status Theorem
0.23/0.55	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_22, type, cHALF: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_23, type, cDOUBLE: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_24, type, cS: $i > $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_25, type, c0: $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_28, type, epred1_2: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_29, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(decl_30, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.23/0.55	thf(cTHM301A, conjecture, (![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ X2 @ X1)<=(cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))<=((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cHALF @ X3 @ X4)=>(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X3)) @ (cS @ X4)))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)<=>![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((X5 @ X3 @ X4)=>(X5 @ (cS @ X3) @ (cS @ (cS @ X4)))))&(X5 @ c0 @ c0))=>(X5 @ X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM301A)).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cHALF @ X3 @ X4)=>(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X3)) @ (cS @ X4)))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)<=>![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((X5 @ X3 @ X4)=>(X5 @ (cS @ X3) @ (cS @ (cS @ X4)))))&(X5 @ c0 @ c0))=>(X5 @ X1 @ X2))))))=>![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)=>(cHALF @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM301A])])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i, X19:$i > $i > $o, X22:$i, X23:$i, X25:$i, X26:$i]:((((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&(~(cHALF @ X15 @ X16)|(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X15)) @ (cS @ X16))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&((((X19 @ (esk1_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19) @ (esk2_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19))|~(X19 @ c0 @ c0)|(X19 @ X17 @ X18)|~(cDOUBLE @ X17 @ X18))&(~(X19 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19))))|~(X19 @ c0 @ c0)|(X19 @ X17 @ X18)|~(cDOUBLE @ X17 @ X18)))&(((~(epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23 @ X25 @ X26)|(epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23 @ (cS @ X25) @ (cS @ (cS @ X26)))|(cDOUBLE @ X22 @ X23))&((epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23 @ c0 @ c0)|(cDOUBLE @ X22 @ X23)))&(~(epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23 @ X22 @ X23)|(cDOUBLE @ X22 @ X23)))))&((cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)&~(cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X5 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)))))|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ (esk2_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5))|(X5 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X5 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5)))))|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))|~((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cHALF @ c0 @ c0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((X5 @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5) @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5))|(X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ (^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8])]), c_0_9])).
0.23/0.55	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_11]), ['proof']).
0.23/0.55	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.23/0.55	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.23/0.55	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.23/0.55	# Initial clauses                      : 14
0.23/0.55	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
0.23/0.55	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.23/0.55	# Processed clauses                    : 31
0.23/0.55	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.23/0.55	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.23/0.55	# ...remaining for further processing  : 30
0.23/0.55	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.23/0.55	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.23/0.55	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.23/0.55	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.23/0.55	# Generated clauses                    : 55
0.23/0.55	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
0.23/0.55	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.23/0.55	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.23/0.55	# Paramodulations                      : 45
0.23/0.55	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.23/0.55	# NegExts                              : 0
0.23/0.55	# Equation resolutions                 : 4
0.23/0.55	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.23/0.55	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.23/0.55	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.23/0.55	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.23/0.55	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.23/0.55	# Current number of processed clauses  : 20
0.23/0.55	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.23/0.55	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.23/0.55	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.23/0.55	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
0.23/0.55	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
0.23/0.55	# ...number of literals in the above   : 82
0.23/0.55	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.23/0.55	# Current number of archived clauses   : 10
0.23/0.55	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
0.23/0.55	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.23/0.55	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.23/0.55	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.23/0.55	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.23/0.55	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.23/0.55	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.23/0.55	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.23/0.55	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.23/0.55	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 9978
0.23/0.55	
0.23/0.55	# -------------------------------------------------
0.23/0.55	# User time                : 0.008 s
0.23/0.55	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.23/0.55	# Total time               : 0.009 s
0.23/0.55	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.23/0.55	
0.23/0.55	# -------------------------------------------------
0.23/0.55	# User time                : 0.009 s
0.23/0.55	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.23/0.55	# Total time               : 0.012 s
0.23/0.55	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.23/0.55	EOF